Blog Post

Incurred Cost Proposal Season is Right Around the Corner

  • By Daniel Fox
  • 08 Nov, 2018

Congratulations! You won a flexibly priced federal contract, obtained provisional billing rates, achieved an adequacy determination on your accounting and timekeeping systems, submitted adequate invoices, and just finished closing your books at the end of your fiscal year. Things are going great! However, the next major task looms on the horizon: the Incurred Cost Proposal.

What is the Incurred Cost Proposal?

The Incurred Cost Proposal calculates and documents a firm’s actual direct and indirect costs and ultimately compares the contractor’s “billed” costs versus “claimed” costs on cost reimbursable type contracts or contract line items. Unlike the commercial world, federal contractors are not necessarily entitled to keep all the funds invoiced on cost reimbursable type federal contracts. The Government may be entitled to recoup some of their payments to the contractor for costs invoiced in excess of actual costs incurred. Conversely, the contractor may be entitled to recoup additional payment from the Government when actual costs incurred exceed the invoiced cost.

Why do I need to complete an Incurred Cost Proposal?

The FAR outlines the requirements and activities you will need to do, and by when. FAR subpart 42.7 “Indirect Cost Rates” outlines the types of indirect rates for contractors performing government contracting, the manner in which the rates are determined, and the purpose of the specific indirect rate type. This subpart will also direct contractors to the “Allowable Cost and Payment” clause at FAR 52.216-7, which provides the specific timing requirement for submission of the incurred cost proposal at six months from the completion of the contractor’s fiscal year. Further, the “Allowable Cost and Payment” clause outlines the various required schedules of direct and indirect costs, as well as other supporting information, required to prepare an adequate incurred cost proposal. The number and complexity of the various required and optional schedules can be overwhelming for new government contractors.

Where do I begin?

Fortunately, there are readily available resources available to help government contractors get started in the right direction. For example, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is tasked with auditing incurred cost proposals for government contractors performing on Department of Defense contracts and as such, the agency provides extremely thorough documentation to explain the required schedules and provide insightful context. Section six of the “DCAA Information for Contractors Manual” covers the requirements, purpose, audit process, and provides explanation of the evaluated cost elements. In addition, the manual introduces government contractors to the DCAA Model Incurred Cost Proposal structure and the Incurred Cost Electronically Model, commonly called the ICE Model. Not only must a new government contractor read and understand all of the documentation, they must apply the one-size-fits-all nature of the regulations and guidance to their unique financial structure.

Growing government contractors typically need help with the practical application of the guidance to their business structure. While the regulation and documentation regarding incurred cost proposals is abundant, their application to a specific government contractor’s situation is not always clear-cut. Furthermore, some of the regulations leave the assessment of reasonableness open to interpretation, and presume contractor understanding of unallowable costs versus expressly unallowable cost. Because of factors such as these, smaller, growing government contractors need specialized assistance to ensure compliance and maintain a solid working relationship with their cognizant audit agency.

For many first-time submitters, the incurred cost proposal represents the first rigorous testing of the firm’s allocation of costs throughout the organization, along with their classification as direct or indirect, and allowable versus unallowable. If the in-depth analysis, planning, and scrubbing of costs were not performed adequately in the development of the provisional billing rates, those weaknesses must be addressed during completion of the Incurred Cost Proposal.

Help is Available!

Consulting firms such as Federal Pricing Group have the expertise to help you prepare timely, accurate, and complete Incurred Cost Proposals that will meet the adequacy requirements of your cognizant audit agency. We guide small, growing government contractors through the Incurred Cost Proposal process. If you are unsure of where you stand with your Incurred Cost Proposal process, or if you are aware of what needs to be done but simply lack the resources, contact Federal Pricing Group today.

About the author: Dan Fox is Partner and Principal Consultant at Federal Pricing Group, a firm focused on providing expert contract pricing to small and mid-sized federal government contractors and cost-related acquisition support services to federal agencies. You can find more resources like this article at https://www.federalpricinggroup.com/blog.

By Mike Gallo March 1, 2021
3 Pricing Ghosts Competitors Can Use to Unseat the Incumbent Prime Contractor
By Mike Gallo January 28, 2021
As federal contractors look forward to a fresh start in the new year, here are three resolutions to to strengthen your competitive pricing posture.
By Mike Gallo May 4, 2020
In this blog, Federal Pricing Group discusses six reasons for justifying higher profit on your next contract. For pricing proposal advice, contact our team today.
By Dan Fox October 2, 2019
Compliance must be ingrained in the company culture and all aspects of management, operations, finance, and business development. Learn more about cost compliance from FPG.
By Federal Pricing Group February 20, 2019
Indirect rates are used to allocate the pro rata share of indirect costs to contracts that benefit from that indirect cost. Learn more about indirect rates by contacting our team today.
By Michael Gallo February 19, 2019
The $100M follow-on contract, AF - ECMM, seems to have escaped credible competition for the last 10+ years. We’re curious to see if the current large business incumbent can work their magic through a SDVOSB partner and maintain their iron grip on this contract.
By Mike Gallo November 5, 2018

After months of wondering what happened to your proposal submission, the Government has responded with pages of pricing questions. Now what? Here’s three tips to help you answer pricing questions.

Common Issues

 Generally, cost and pricing questions fall into four broad issue areas:

  • Omission  The Government believes something is missing from your price proposal. It could be something as simple as a sub-total calculation error or something more serious such as unpriced tasks that are identified in your technical volume, but not included in your price.
  • Necessity  The Government believes something priced into the proposal is not relevant or ‘in-scope’. Sometimes a lack of a clear explanation of how costs were derived and or calculated can also lead the Government to question certain costs. Lump sum costs, without underlying details and explanation, are a great example of this.
  • Consistency  The Government believes something in your pricing doesn’t align with your technical volume. This can occur when last minute pricing drills shave costs (such as staff hours), but the change is not reflected in the technical volume (or vice versa).
  • Reasonableness/Realism  If the Government says a particular cost appears ‘unreasonable’, they’re saying they think it’s too high. Conversely, if the Government says a particular cost appears 'unrealistic', they’re concerned it's too low.

Three Helpful Tips

How should companies respond to these questions?

1.     Don't fight the Fed.

Even if you disagree with the evaluator's question, keep in mind there’s something unclear in your proposal that created ambiguity and doubt in the evaluator’s mind. Don’t take it personally. Avoid argumentative language in your responses that just serves to aggravate the evaluators and doesn’t help you to address the issues raised. The fact that the Government may think a proposed cost might be too high (or too low) doesn’t necessarily mean you should revise your price. Often the Government uses terms such as ‘Justify’, ‘Substantiate’, ‘Clarify’, ‘Explain’, etc. to describe their need for additional information.

2.    Fortify answers with facts and data, not more unsubstantiated assertions.

The four main issues: Omission, Necessity, Consistency, and Reasonableness/Realism almost always boil down to a lack of adequate documentation and substantiation as a root cause. Provide corroborating evidence to justify unit costs and rates. Clearly explain how costs were derived and/or calculated.

3.     Make it Easy for the Evaluator.

If you elect to revise your pricing, clearly track those changes in your pricing model. This is especially important when there are numerous and significant changes to price. The Government needs to understand how and why your price changed. Highlight cost elements that were added to your proposal. Identify unit cost and rates that were revised. Flag items that were removed from your revised proposal. Also ensure to provide a brief narrative summarizing what has changed in your revised proposal pricing.

 Conclusion

Breathe a little sigh of relief. Your firm has progressed through 1st cut. While your firm hasn’t won the contract (yet), the Government believes your proposal has enough merit and deems it worthy enough for additional consideration.

Remember, the Government is evaluating MANY proposals in addition to your proposal. Contracting officers want to progress to contract award, now ! Help them by clearly, accurately, comprehensively responding to evaluator pricing questions. Give the evaluators the missing pricing facts and data they need so they can demonstrate they evaluated your winning proposal objectively, fairly, and consistently.


About the author:  Mike Gallo is Partner and Principal Consultant at Federal Pricing Group, a consulting firm focused on providing expert contracts pricing to small and mid-sized federal government contractors and cost-related acquisition support services to federal agencies. Learn more at https://www.federalpricinggroup.com/.

By Mike Gallo October 15, 2018
In this blog, Federal Pricing Group discusses five good practices for building robust pricing volume compliance matrices. Learn more by contacting our team today.
By Mike Gallo September 30, 2018
Federal Transit Administration 2019 PMO Draft RFP Pricing Synopsis
By Al Pearce August 13, 2018
Pricing Synopsis for the NavAir Logistics Support/Technical Data Solicitation
More Posts
Share by: